Don’t call them DREAMers; call them whiners.
Earlier this month two self-described DREAMers — children who were illegally brought into the United States by their parents — confronted Congressman Steve King for advocating enforcement of the immigration laws as reported by Tony Lee for Breitbart, and they could not have been any more unsympathetic in their purported plight
The pair believe that illegal children who were partly raised in the United States are entitled to some form of legal status. However, this specious argument is somewhat akin to trespassing squatters demanding legal title to the property they’re occupying. Legal rights are not acquired through illegal acts. However, niceties in the law apparently are beyond the ken of the two who badgered Representative King, and the good Congressman increasingly became exacerbated over their seeming failure to appreciate fully the illegality by which they arrived in the country.
The seeming disrespect which the two DREAMers displayed towards Congressman King — one even later accused him of “hatred” — was particularly offensive given that they are uninvited guests in the United States. A host has the right to call the cops on someone who crashes the party. It’s not about hate against the interloper; it’s about being king of one’s castle. A country is entitled to enforce its boundaries the same way a party host can set the guest list. The annoying DREAMers not only have crashed the party but now they’re telling the host what music to play.
If the DREAMers and other illegal aliens don’t like the conditions by which they exist in the United States they are free to return to their native lands. Indeed, the education and skills which illegal aliens have acquired in the United States may be put to better use in their own countries, and instead of selfishly pursuing their American dreams perhaps they should return home to compassionately build a better country for their fellow citizens.
Further reading that may be of interest:
Each day thousands of children from Mexico and Latin America illegally cross the border, and Nancy Pelosi, the blowhard Congresswoman from San Francisco, CA, says to treat them like Baby Jesus as reported by Breitbart:
“I reference the conference of bishops statement in which they say baby Jesus was a refugee from violence. Let us not turn away these children and send them back into a burning building. That’s the bishops, so we have to do this in a way that honors our values but also protects our border and does so in a way that the American people understand more clearly.”
Of course, these border children aren’t wrapped in swaddling clothes but largely are pimply teens.
In 2013 “91% of illegal immigrant ‘children’ apprehended at the border were teenagers,” and “of the nearly 60,000 illegal immigrant ‘children’ who were apprehended since October of last year, 84% have been teenagers” according to Pew research as reported by Breitbart. Moreover, “males between 15-17 years of age comprise 47 percent of all unaccompanied minors” according to Homeland Security as reported by Breitbart.
So basically it’s a bunch of older teen boys swarming the southwest border, and no demographic group terrifies law enforcement more than adolescent testosterone. For example, earlier this week three degenerate teens — 18-year-old Alex Rios, 16-year-old Nathaniel Carillo and 15-year-old Gilbert Tafoya — confessed to their roles in the beating deaths of two homeless men in Albuquerque, NM, and in commenting on the crime forensic psychologist N.G. Berrill said “the most dangerous person on the planet is a teenage boy” particularly when reinforcing his bad behavior with peers as reported by NBC News. Indeed, after murdering the homeless men, 16-year-old Nathaniel Carillo told police officers that he “looked at himself in the mirror and ‘saw the devil.'”
Not all children are as harmless as the Baby Jesus, and the street gangs will have a recruiting bonanza as the Obama Administration unloads tens of thousands of teen boys with no legitimate prospects on unsuspecting communities across the United States.
Further reading that may be of interest:
The blowhard activists who insist upon universal amnesty for illegal aliens under the guise of immigration reform now are characterizing the law-breaking migrants crossing the southwest border from Mexico and Central America as sympathy-inducing refugees fleeing violent gangs. For example, Democrat tool Robert Reich describes the illegal aliens as “refugees of the drug wars,” and Rep. Joseph Crowley, the vice chair of the Democrat Caucus, says they’re “coming across as refugees because of the violence that they are facing in their homelands.” Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick goes so far as to compare their plight to Jews fleeing the Nazis in World War II. However, the border crossers are not crime victims deserving American asylum; rather, they are opportunistic illegals exploiting America’s goodness.
Rosa Leal de Perez, the first lady of Guatemala, visited the United States southwest border earlier this month, and although acknowledging violence was a problem in her country expressly said that street gangs did not even exist in many of the rural communities from which the poor migrants came. Indeed, when the illegal aliens press their asylum claims at later hearings — presuming they even bother to show up for the scheduled proceedings — they better be prepared to offer more than gratuitous assertions about safety concerns from gang violence and drug wars. For example, each applicant must be prepared to rat out whatever gangs exist in his or her native town including naming their members and describing their crimes. Moreover, the asylum seekers must demonstrate how these supposed gangs actually pose a direct threat to them. If the illegal aliens are unable to substantiate their asylum claims with credible details, then they should be prosecuted for immigration fraud.
Of course, few if any of these illegal aliens will be able to make a compelling case for asylum as a refugee. Indeed, although they characterize themselves as victims they’re more like the criminals. After all, it’s hard to take their complaints about crime groups seriously when they paid thousands to human smugglers tied to the drug cartels in order to cross into the United States. The drug user is just as guilty as the drug dealer; the john is as bad as the whore; the gambler is as culpable as the bookie; and the illegal alien is as criminal as the human smuggler.
And it’s ironic that these illegal aliens claim the only safe spot for them is in America. Leaving Mexico and Central America for the United States is a lot like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. After all, the drug cartels and street gangs are well-entrenched in hundreds of communities throughout the United States. For example, the Sinaloa cartel supplies 80 percent of the illicit drugs for Chicago, IL which also serves as the midwest hub for distribution operations, and as many as 100,000 gangbangers in Chicagoland are under its proverbial thumb. One imprisoned narco who worked for the Sinaloa cartel characterizes Chicago as a “time bomb” waiting to explode. It’s actually funny to hear the liberal Democrats speak of the United States as a safe refuge for the illegal aliens from armed conflict because after each semi-annual mass shooting these same drama queens hysterically despair about gun violence in the country as the worst in the world.
The new push for immigration reform by the Democrat Party in order to expand their Hispanic base is trying to manipulate the good hearts of the American people by re-characterizing the illegals as refugees. No doubt Mexico and Central America have a problem with organized crime but so do many European and Eurasian countries. Is every citizen from the impoverished Calabria, Sicily and Naples regions of Southern Italy now entitled to American asylum in fleeing the pervasive Mafia? It’s unlikely since they’re not allied with La Raza, and that’s all about which the race-hustling Democrat Party really cares in the immigration debate.
Further reading that may be of interest:
The proponents of so-called immigration reform have launched a propaganda campaign to hoodwink the American people into accepting amnesty for illegal aliens, and their message is fraudulently built on cheap sentiment, misleading statements and outright lies. Just remember: the people behind immigration reform – the far left of the Democrat Party and the business wing of the Republican Party – are the same con artists who sold the good citizens a false bill of goods in hawking ObamaCare. Remember all those repeated claims that if you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan? These people cannot be trusted. And here are seven lies that are behind the spin machine for immigration reform.
Lie No. 1: The System Is Broken
Twenty to forty million illegal aliens reside in the United States but this is not the result of immigration laws that need revamping but a failure to enforce existing laws. Indeed, the principal “reform” offered by the Obama Administration does not fundamentally change the current system but simply offers universal amnesty — euphemistically characterized as a pathway to citizenship — for those already here. Offering amnesty to illegals in the name of immigration reform is the same as offering pardons to convicts in the name of prison reform.
Lie No. 2: The Border Is Secure
Most illegals arrived into the United States simply by walking over the border from Mexico. It’s so easy a child can do it. Indeed, even as the political hacks at Homeland Security insist the Southwest border is more secure than ever, unaccompanied minors cross it each day by the thousands. “Fixing” the immigration system through amnesty for all those illegals currently in the United States seems rather pointless if the problem only will continue through an open border. .
Lie No. 3: Illegals Are Not Criminals
Crossing over the border without authorization is an express crime pursuant to section 1325 of title 8 in the U.S. Code. Moreover, many illegal aliens entered the United States by paying smuggling guides tied to the Mexican cartels, and therefore are complicit co-conspirators in the crime rackets which corrupts their native land. Finally, once in the country, many illegal aliens engage in identity theft, tax evasion and document forgery in maintaining their stay.
Lie No. 4: Illegal Crossings Are “Acts Of Love”
Parents are not providing their children with a better life by dragging them on a treacherous journey from Mexico into America through smuggling corridors controlled by drug cartels. Worse yet are those parents who encourage their kids to make this perilous trek alone. A civilized society would characterize such acts as child endangerment, and these unfit parents already residing — legally or otherwise — in the United States should have their parental rights terminated.
Lie No. 5: America Is A Nation Of Immigrants
Immigration waves from past generations of long ago do not justify current influxes. It was one thing to welcome the huddled masses through long-closed Ellis Island during the country’s expansion from an unsettled land to a mature economy but there no longer is a compelling need for any more bodies under an antiquated 19th-century immigration attitude. Government resources for basic services such as medical care and public education already are stretched thin, and the private economy is experiencing high unemployment and anemic growth. Further population expansion through illegal immigration very well could throw this precarious state into a downward spiral from which the nation may never recover. A century ago this country may have been built on immigration but the cheap invocation of this warm sentiment is a poor substitute for a rational policy in today’s world.
Lie No. 6: Embracing Illegals Is A Moral Duty
An old lady who takes in stray cats may be a good-hearted soul but there’s a limit to how many the dear thing can care for without becoming an unfortunate hoarder whose home becomes a mess. America already has reached the tipping point in the number of illegal aliens it can sustain. Heck, the country no longer can even provide decent jobs to all of its own citizens, and now Barack Obama and his White House crew want to open the economic door to illegal aliens? It’s a shame that our elected officials are more concerned about illegal aliens than the American people who actually pay their salaries. Charity – and opportunity — begins at home.
Lie No. 7: Immigration Opponents Are Hateful Racists
Hispanic people existed in the Southwest well before America’s founding, and as the region was folded into the country their culture was woven into the national fabric. No one is trying to keep out Hispanics; indeed, they have long proudly existed in great numbers as a vibrant force within the United States. Moreover, given that many Hispanics from Mexico identify as white due to their Spanish ancestry, accusing those who oppose illegal immigration as hateful racists is patently laughable. The issue is not Mexicans; the problem is illegals. Of course, race hustlers who casually hurl incendiary charges to advance their political agenda are perhaps the lowest form of human intelligence, and they engage in such desperate tactics only because their substantive positions on the underlying issues otherwise have no merit.
Here’s the truth about the spin campaign to provide universal amnesty for the 20 to 40 million illegal aliens in the United States: the far left in the Democrat Party wants to increase its voting bloc among the entitlement class, and the business wing of the Republican Party wants a bigger pool of cheap labor. Hopefully, the American people won’t swallow their lies.
Further reading that may be of interest:
The shocking lawsuit against X-Men Director Bryan Singer is only the first salvo in a legal campaign to address alleged child molestation by Hollywood powerhouses.
The lawsuit against Singer was filed by acclaimed attorney Jeff Herman who says “Hollywood has a problem with the sexual exploitation of children,” and “this is the first of many cases I will be filing to give these victims a voice and to expose the issue” as reported by Ted Johnson for Variety. Indeed, the Miami-based lawyer says “three more lawsuits will be filed next week” as reported by Kyle Muzenriede for the Miami New Times.
Herman says that since filing the action against Singer “he has been amazed by what he’s discovered about the widespread nature of sex abuse in Hollywood and the unspoken knowledge of such conduct” as reported by Ryan Buxton for The Huffington Post:
“I’ve seen a lot of things — [defending victims of sexual abuse] is all that I do — but I don’t know that I’ve ever seen a more organized and ongoing open secret,” he said. “I’m getting regular contacts from people saying, ‘Oh, you should hear what’s happening over here.'” Herman added that he’s been told about numerous “vile” rings of sexual predation, some of which overlap. But “the commonality of this is they’re all men in Hollywood, all men using their positions of power and influence to sexually exploit children,” he said.
Award-winning filmmaker Amy Berg who made the documentary Deliver Us From Evil about molesting priests is at work on a project to expose the degenerate underbelly among the Tinseltown brotherhood, and among her sources is Singer’s accuser Michael Egan III as reported by Sara Nathan for the Daily Mail.
Meanwhile, Singer denies the allegations, and says he has proof that he was not even in Hawaii when the alleged rape of Egan occurred as reported by The Associated Press: “Singer was mainly in Toronto working on the first X-Men movie from August through October 1999, defense attorney Marty Singer told The Associated Press.” Moreover, the FBI says that Egan never mentioned Singer when he lodged a 2000 criminal complaint which did result in the conviction of another as reported by TMZ.
There previously have been allegations of powerful entertainment industry figures molesting young boys. For example, in 1975 the NYDA and NYPD initiated an investigation dubbed Operation Together which, among other things, was looking into mob-controlled underage boy sex rings, and according to a now-retired detective assigned to the case with whom this blogger spoke a now-deceased Hollywood director nominated for multiple Oscars was notorious for sex parties at his Long Island estate which were stocked with jail bait. The investigation further allegedly implicated individuals at the highest levels in New York City politics, power and society, and was shut down in 1977 by “top brass” over the objections of assigned investigators and an ADA as they were on the verge of bringing indictments.
A few years later investigator Dale Smith from the New York State Senate’s Select Committee on Crime, said in a July 27, 1982 article by the Associated Press that “organized crime in New York” was running a six-city boy prostitution network – Los Angeles, San Francisco, New Orleans, New York, Washington and Houston – with the “male prostitutes between the ages of 13 and 16 . . . shuttled between the cities.”
1980s child star Corey Feldman claims in his recent memoir Coreyography that the entertainment industry in Hollywood is riddled with pedophiles who prey on the young talent as reported by Sherryl Connelly for the Daily News: “Feldman . . . charges that the ‘number one problem in Hollywood was, and is, and always will be, pedophilia.'”
Query whether the FBI — a Bureau spokespersons insists it “vigorously pursues all allegations involving the sexual abuse of minors” as reported by Hollie McKay for Fox News — has yet sent any special agents to interview Feldman about his repeated claims.
Further reading that may be of interest:
Al Sharpton has pushed back hard against recent allegations that in the mid-1980s he was a mob associate who only became a mob rat after the FBI seemingly captured him on surveillance video claiming to know a potential purchaser for multiple kilos of pure cocaine.
There could be multiple reasons for the vociferous denials by Reverand Al. Maybe he doesn’t want a criminal past to sully his reputation now that he’s rubbing elbows with the power elite. Or maybe he doesn’t want the snitch label to undermine his street cred. Heck, maybe Al Sharpton is innocent as he claims, and he went to the FBI after receiving threats from the wise guys for his activism in the music industry.
Of course, if the allegations are true that Al Sharpton once was a mob associate, then he was an Uncle Tom who betrayed his own people for personal gain, and perhaps that’s the reason the good Reverend insists he never worked for the Mafia. After all, it’s hard to claim that you’re working as a civil rights activist for the downtrodden black community when you’re a mobbed-up parasite feasting upon your own people.
The Mafia long has exploited the black community, and in big cities in the Midwest and the Northeast it has done as much harm as the KKK in the South.
How many black lives were destroyed by the drugs peddled by the Mafia? How much black wealth was stolen through the numbers game which was called the Italian lottery by some and the “n***** pool” by others? How many black workers were denied good jobs because of racist mobsters who controlled the unions?
And allegedly Al Sharpton was a willing participant in the mob’s black exploitation as reported by The Smoking Gun:
At one point before he was “flipped,” Sharpton participated in a mob scheme to create a business front that would seek a share of lucrative Con Edison set-asides intended for minority-owned businesses. That deal, which involved garbage collection contracts, cratered when the power company determined that Sharpton’s silent partner was Genovese captain Matthew “Matty the Horse” Ianniello.
Indeed, Colombo-mobster-turned-Christian-evangelical Michael Franzese knew Al Sharpton back in the day, and the reformed mobster alleges the good reverend is not coming clean about his mob past as reported by Jerry Capeci for Gang Land News: “He was a gun for hire, our gun for hire,” recalled Franzese, and “he built his reputation on defending the civil rights of blacks, but he would exploit them for money.”
Moreover, it’s not simply that the Mafia criminally exploited the black community but many mobsters are vile racists.
For example, Nicholas “Nicky Skins” Stefanelli, the Gambino soldier who wore a wire for the G-men until committing suicide two years ago, once was charged by federal prosecutors for his alleged role in beating a black man in a landmark civil rights case.
On September 30, 1972 the victim, Robert L. Chavers, was eating at Ed’s Diner in the white North Ward section of Newark, NJ, and Stefanelli and two other reputed Gambino mobsters allegedly beat him because they did not want black people at the eatery as reported in a March 8, 1975 article (“2 Are Guilty of Violating Civil Rights of a Black“) for The Associated Press.
Stefanelli and the two others, Robert Bisaccia and Louis Fulco, were charged by the United States Task Force Against Organized Crime with violating the victim’s civil rights under the public accomodations statute, and the case represented the first time that the Task Force had used the law against reputed mobsters in New Jersey. A hung jury resulted in a mistrial against the trio, and the charge later was dismissed against Stefanelli although his co-defendants Bisaccia and Fulco pled guilty during a second trial against them.
Frankly, it’s unfathomable how President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder could stand by their man Al Sharpton if the allegations are confirmed. Indeed, Holder knows first hand the racist blood that often runs through the Italian Mafia. During his early years as an assistant prosecutor Holder convicted reputed Bufalino mobster James Osticco, and upon first learning that Holder was black Osticco allegedly uttered a racist slur.
Of course, Al Sharpton and his political cronies today maintain power and make money from race hustling, and the last thing to which they can admit is that the good Reverend once may have been a mobbed-up Uncle Tom. After all, that kind of talk might kill the goose that lays the golden egg. It all sounds like just another racket.
Earlier this month the FBI busted an alleged drug smuggling scheme between New York’s Mafia and Italy’s Calabrian Mafia.
Of course, regular readers of Beyond Peradventure were not surprised to learn about the transatlantic alliance. After all, for years this blog has warned that the drug trafficking Calabrian Mafia – or ‘Ndrangheta — was entrenched in the United States and Canada with surprisingly little push back from law enforcement. Indeed, the crime group is suspected of backing a breakaway faction from the Rizzuto family in Montreal, QB Canada for control over the drug rackets in Montreal and New York, and it necessarily would have to hook up with New York’s Mafia in order to push product in their territory. According to the FBI the Calabrian Mafia has partnered with reputed associates from the Gambino and Bonanno families that are obvious choices given their long-standing involvement in the international drug trade.
The only surprise about the bust is its narrow reach into the supposed scheme concerning both smuggling logistics and involved players. For example, the feds allege that Mexican cartel-supplied cocaine would move from Guyana, South America into Gioia Tauro, Calabria but clam up in explaining how the product would move from Italy to Canada and then into New York which of course was the entire point of partnering with the Gambino and Bonanno families. And curiously no made members – let alone any bosses — from these two crime families are named defendants in the indictment; rather, only a reputed associate from each — Franco Lupoi and Charles Centaro, respectively — have been charged.
The failure to address the drug pipeline from Canada into New York or to include additional defendants aren’t minor gaps in the smuggling scheme but gaping holes. Indeed, Lupoi supposedly claimed he could smuggle anyone from Canada into New York through an Indian reservation which straddles over both jurisdictions, and a law enforcement source said it’s likely the drug operation was approved by his Gambino bosses. So why doesn’t the indictment reflect these components? As currently framed the indictment touches only the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
The FBI states its investigation is “ongoing “ but the bust has provided the Gambino and Bonnano families with a heads up, and its undercover agent “Jimmy” who infiltrated the purported plot is now out of any information loop. Lupoi allegedly was instrumental in brokering the joint alliance between the Gambino family and the Calabrian Mafia, and due to his supposed ties to reputed underboss Frank Cali and soldier Pete Inzerillo perhaps the feds hope to flip him before bringing a superseding and more expansive indictment.
The bust has raised more questions than it’s answered, and the $64,000 question is what role, if any, Calabrian mobsters from New York – and perhaps even their Gambino and Bonanno partners — have with the ongoing resurrection against the Rizzuto family in Montreal, Canada for control over the drug pipeline into the Big Apple. Among those charged in the New York drug bust was reputed ‘Ndrangheta associate Raffaele Valente, and in successfully keeping him behind bars pending trial the government alleged in a court-filed detention memorandum that “Valente has been recorded on Italian court-authorized wiretaps bragging about the armed and violent group he has assembled in New York.” Moreover, among those killed in the ongoing drug war in Montreal was former Bonanno boss Salvatore “Sal the Ironworker” Montagna who was allied with the Calabrian Mafia until their relationship soured.
The one thing that has been seemingly confirmed by the bust is that the Gambino and Bonanno families include foreign nationals among its members and associates who are deeply involved in the global drug trade. However, the question remains when the U.S. Treasury Department will designate them as transnational criminal organizations under Executive Order 13581 to freeze their assets and ban Americans from conducting any business with them.
Further reading that may be of interest: